A lot of people confuse tax avoidance and tax evasion. It can be a
dangerous mistake to make!
As the former British Chancellor of the Exchequer Denis Healey said once:
“The difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is the thickness
of a prison wall”.
What can’t be stressed enough is that the two terms – and the actions
each entails – are definitely not the same thing.
- Tax avoidance
involves using whatever legal means you choose to reduce your
current or future tax liabilities.
- Tax evasion
means doing illegal things to avoid paying taxes. It’s the Al
Capone path to financial freedom.
I’ve never evaded taxes, I don’t condone it, and I couldn’t tell you how
it’s done.
Tax avoidance is another matter. As the tax have risen in the Western countries to pay
down public debt, it makes sense for business to do what they can to reduce
their tax burden without overly compromising other aspects of their lives.
The United Kingdom and jurisdictions following the UK approach (such as
New Zealand) have recently adopted the evasion/avoidance terminology as used in
the United States: evasion is a criminal attempt to avoid paying tax owed while
avoidance is an attempt to use the law to reduce taxes owed
There is, however, a further distinction drawn between tax avoidance and
tax mitigation. Tax avoidance is a course of action designed to conflict with
or defeat the evident intention of Parliament.
Tax mitigation is conduct which reduces tax liabilities without “tax
avoidance” (not contrary to the intention of Parliament), for instance, by
gifts to charity or investments in certain assets which qualify for tax relief.
This is important for tax provisions which apply in cases of “avoidance”: they
are held not to apply in cases of mitigation.
I suspect this is largely a courtroom debate, caused by the Revenue
looking to close down schemes of dubious legality created by planners for
wealthy individuals.
So if I have to pull back my thoughts on where we started from, in very
simple terms, tax avoidance is legal, but tax evasion is illegal and you risk
prosecution for breaking the law.
However, in some sophisticated cases the Taxman has been trying to blur
the boundaries and claim some forms of tax avoidance are illegal.
A few examples will show the difference…
• The most common example of Tax Evasion amongst small businesses is
making cash sales and not putting this money into your bank account or
recording it in your accounting records, so the tax man will never know about
it, or so you think!
• A slightly more thought out example, may be making up some forged
purchase invoices. You write out the cheques to pay them with the name of the
fictitious supplier on the cheque stub but it’s actually made payable to you and
goes into a secret offshore account. Again, this is tax evasion and is illegal.
• Choosing to run your business as a Limited Company rather than as a
sole trader in order to benefit from lower rates of tax paid by Limited
Companies is an example of tax avoidance and is legal.
But it’s not always black and white, there are grey areas…
This may be because the law itself is in question or the facts of your particular
case are in question. It often arises that HMRC may interpret something in one
way, surprisingly to their advantage, but the accountant and the taxpayer may
interpret it differently.
Please remember that HMRC do not make the law of the land and they often
can get it wrong. Be prepared to stand up for your rights if necessary and
don’t be bullied by them.
You should fight HMRC on technical grounds, but you need to be very sure
of your facts and the law. If you can’t come to an agreement with HMRC, the
matter normally ends up before the first tier Tax Tribunals who are an informal
independent Tax Court to decide the matter. Many accountants don’t like going
to the tribunal but they shouldn’t be afraid to go if they have a reasonable argument.
HMRC know it costs you money in accountants’ fees to argue with them and
you may back down as the tax saved is not worth it after paying your
accountant. In these situations look at getting your accountant to work on a no
win, no fee basis for you if you aren’t already covered for Tax investigation
issues.
The good news is that this is something we offer as standard within our
accounting package which means you never have to worry about HMRC
investigations.
So if you are looking for accountants who aren’t afraid to challenge
HMRC and fight your corner when you are right plus offers complete peace of
mind for any HMRC investigation then get in touch with us. Please visit www.apjaccoutnancy.com or call 020 8931 0165.